Skip to main content
University of Wisconsin–Madison

Author: Dave Wilcox

News Organizations push back on White House photo restrictions

Thirty eight news organizations signed a letter to White House press secretary Jay Carney protesting a strict policy that greatly limits news photographers’ access to President Obama.   As reported by the Los Angeles Times, Poynter and others, and recapped on iMediaEthics.com, several news organizations state they will not use any photographs or footage provided by the White House, except for the rare occasions involving national security restrictions on press access.

The letter suggests White House restrictions are similar to censorship, saying,

“As surely as if they were placing a hand over a journalist’s camera lens, officials in this administration are blocking the public from having an independent view of important functions of the Executive Branch of government.”

Read the complete iMediaEthics article here.

Journalism Educators Call for CBS News to Correct their Correction of the 60 Minutes Benghazi Story

Amidst the corrections, critiques and internal investigations, the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC) called upon CBS News to rethink the way the network is handling key aspects of the correction.  AEJMC president Paula Poindexter notes that the original and incorrect version of the story has been scrubbed from both the CBS News online archive and the 60 Minutes You Tube Channel, “as if to say the Benghazi report never existed.”

“This handling of the report and its correction will likely further damage the public’s already low opinion of journalism. The Pew Research Center has found that only 18 percent of the public believes the press is “willing to admit mistakes” and almost three-quarters believe news organizations “try to cover up mistakes.” Recognizing how important correcting mistakes is to the public’s trust in journalism, the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), the largest association of journalism and communication educators in the world, calls upon 60 Minutes to return the original broadcast to its website and YouTube channel.

“Correcting an inaccurate broadcast that has aired is challenging, but in today’s digital world, it can be done in a way that simultaneously preserves the original broadcast for the historical and journalistic record and tells the truth about the inaccurate content. Therefore, AEJMC recommends that 60 Minutes embed the original report together with Logan’s official correction and the link to her Nov. 8, 2013 CBS This Morning interview in which she answered tough questions about events that led to the defective report. Additionally, a correction should be superimposed across the video so there is no misunderstanding about the inaccurate content in the report.”

Read the entire article here.

First Do No Harm: Physician-Journalists and ethical reporting

It is increasingly common for news organizations to employ physicians as journalist who report on health and medical issues.  Gary Schwitzer wonders who is responsible for training these physician-journalists in media ethics.  Schwitzer is the publisher of and  senor reviewer for HealthNewsReview.org, an organization that analyzes healthcare reporting, media relations and advertising.  One of his biggest concerns is the prevalence of undisclosed conflicts of interest.

Would Welles War of the Worlds radio program play in the age of Social Media?

When the Columbia Broadcasting System broadcast The Mercury Radio Theater’s version of H.G. Wells’ “War of the Worlds,” Orson Welles managed to convince a portion of his audience that Martians were attacking Earth.  Media reports that followed told of mass hysteria and widespread panic.  Recent research suggests the alleged panic was mostly a media fallacy.

The public radio program Big Picture Science looked into how and why the media of the day created and advanced stories of a frightened public.  As part of their story, they spoke with Katy Culver, associate director of the UW Center for Journalism Ethics about the changing nature of journalism ethics, asking “Can we tweet ‘Mars is attacking!’ with impunity?”

Listen to the broadcast: http://traffic.libsyn.com/arewealone/BiPiSci13-10-21.mp3

Wisconsin legislators’ budget maneuver also strikes against Ethics Center’s core mission

On June 5, the Wisconsin Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee added a provision to the proposed state budget that would require the independent, non-profit Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism to leave its home in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication.  The provision would also prohibit anyone employed by the University “from doing any work related to the Center for Investigative Journalism as part of their duties as a UW employee.”

CC_capitol_statue_proxy_indian

This action came as a complete surprise, blindsiding WCIJ just as the budget neared completion.  No legislator has yet been willing to candidly explain why this punitive, unwarranted, targeted action was taken, much less why it was passed without any debate or opportunity for challenge.

If it remains in the budget, the Joint Finance Committee’s action will affect not only WCIJ, but the Ethics Center and J-School faculty, staff and students as well.  And the impact will be nothing but harmful for all.  The Center has had a productive collaborative relationship with WCIJ from the beginning.  That relationship is now threatened with extinction.  Reaction to the provision from all quarters has been vehement and overwhelmingly critical, but the budget bill remains unchanged.

As the Ethics Center’s incoming director, I am deeply troubled, angered, frustrated and astonished by the actions of the legislators who voted to act against WCIJ, the Journalism School and its students in this way. And I hope either they or the governor will reconsider.

The Center’s associate director, Prof. Katy Culver, has eloquently described the situation and its potential impact in a recent post to PBS’s Mediashift.  We reprint it below with permission, and we invite and welcome your comments.

Prof. Robert Drechsel

Director, Center for Journalism Ethics

——————————

Wisconsin Lawmakers Try to Remove Investigative Reporting Center from University of Wisconsin

By 

Early this week, I awoke to learn that University of Wisconsin-Madison journalism student Mario Koran had won a prestigious scholarship named for a brave and talented young journalist who died last year while reporting in Mexico City.

Yesterday morning, I awoke to learn an overnight move by some in the Wisconsin legislature threatened the very collaboration that helped forge Koran’s reporting skills and imperiled my freedom to teach and influence young journalists like him. I am reeling from the juxtaposition, and every person who cares about moving journalism education forward should feel threatened by these events.

Screenshot from Mario Koran's "Lost signals, disconnected lives."

Koran is a student in our journalism master’s program and went on to the New York Times Student Journalism Institute, a program that draws two dozen journalism students into work with professionals to advance their reporting and writing skills. Koran won the inaugural Armando Montaño Scholarship. At just 22, “Mando” was found dead in Mexico City, shortly after beginning an internship with the Associated Press. The circumstances remain murky, but he had just finished an assignment about police violence. He’s remembered widely for his courage and passion for reporting.

Koran shares that passion, and he was able to stoke his fire through the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism, a novel –- and award-winning -– collaboration. The non-profit and nonpartisan center partners with our School of Journalism and Mass Communication to employ student interns and pursue highly respected investigative journalism to serve the public.

Part of WCIJ’s mission is to serve as a government watchdog, helping ensure our representatives act in citizens’ best interests. To that end, Koran just completed an investigation into failures in the GPS technology used to track sex offenders. It led to hearings, at which legislators read from his pieces to reinforce the gravity of problems.

Under attack

So everyone associated with WCIJ was blindsided by an overnight move to expel the center from its offices within our journalism program. The school provides no funding to the center, which is supported entirely by outside grants. It receives free space through a facilities-use agreement, in return for guaranteed paid internships for students like Koran, as well as guest lectures, class visits and educational support.

The state’s legislative Joint Finance Committee on Wednesday added a budget measure barring UW from housing the center in its space. But even more critically –- and dangerously -– the measure purports to end any interaction between journalism faculty and staff and the center:

“In addition, prohibit UW employees from doing any work related to the Center for Investigative Journalism as part of their duties as a UW employee.” (See the full motion from Sen. Alberta Darling, R-River Hills, and Rep. John Nygren, R-Marinette)

This direct attack on our collaboration with WCIJ is an assault on our academic freedom, as well as on student learning. I had the privilege of meeting with Koran when he was just beginning his look at recidivism in the criminal justice system as a WCIJ intern. I told him I was astounded to learn of the proportion and cost of returning offenders to jail in the state and encouraged him to hunt for angles related to that. I did this in my capacity as a journalism professor, for which I am compensated by the university.

Threat to freedom and independence

To be clear: As written, the legislative budget measure would bar this conversation. Bar it. It would similarly prevent other things I have done with the center over the years -– reviewing intern applications, teasing out ideas from datasets, consulting on leads. And my association with the center pales in comparison with that provided by some of my colleagues.

(For a longer discussion about the motives of the Committee members adding this provision to the bill, read this article from The Cap Times.)

Clearly the measure raises constitutional questions, as a state institution that can bar us from working with WCIJ could also bar my writing for, say, MediaShift or the New York Times. And the measure is not yet a done deal. Cooler heads in the state Senate or Assembly could move to extract the provision or Gov. Scott Walker could use his line-item veto on it. Even the state’s most noted right-wing media figure, Charlie Sykes, called the action ”petty, vindictive and dumb.”

I hope citizens throughout the state and, indeed across the country, call on the legislature and governor to step back and recognize the danger of this kind of interference. Responses from the centerschool and university decry the impact on students and the climate for public affairs reporting.

Innovation on the line

Just last year, the center and school won the Associated Press Media Editors’ first-ever award for Innovator of the Year for College Students. Brant Houston, the center’s board president and Knight Chair in Investigative Reporting at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, said, “The school and center have pioneered effective ways to involve students in producing award-winning journalism in the public interest.”

Every educator, reporter and organization that champions forward-thinking journalism education should fear the legislature’s effort and the censorial intentions behind it. Efforts to kill the intern model here in Wisconsin endanger other pro-am efforts housed at public universities in other states. Our WCIJ interns work with text, audio, video and data in addition to and in service of their reporting. They are getting daily, real-world, multimedia, leading-edge experiences that simply cannot be replaced in a classroom.

In the end, they suffer. “My time as part of the original, founding class of interns at WCIJ was invaluable in launching my career,” said former intern Alex Morrell, who has worked for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Green Bay Press-Gazette and Associated Press. “It taught me to think clearly and dissect complex issues with precision and confidence. It instilled in me the public value of fair, non-partisan investigative reporting and trained me to approach every issue and idea with the same vigor.”

Citizens suffer, too. No news outlet has covered the issues reported by WCIJ with its depth or sustained focus. The center’s free distribution of its work has informed audiences of 230 news outlets across the state and nation.

Fighting for press freedom

In a climate fraught with recent government surveillance of AP and FOX News reporters, every one of us must be vigilant. Students like Koran deserve the very best and most innovative models journalism education can give them. And citizens deserve the most full-throated defense of public affairs reporting and open government we can muster.

This brazen move against students and journalism is unconscionable. Our silence would be unforgivable.

——————–

for related commentary:

Read Prof. Deborah Blum’s comments on Wired.com

Read the statement by Greg Downey, director, UW-Madison School of Journalism & Mass Communication

 

The search for sensitive coverage of the tragedy of suicide: An Australian story

One of the toughest situations a journalist can face is reporting on tragic events, especially the delicate matter of suicide. In this article, professor and longtime Australian journalist Leo Bowman tells the story of one newspaper’s unique campaign to start an open conversation about the complex issue of mental health. Continue reading

Journalism Conference Marks New Era

For the Center for Journalism Ethics (CJE), the fifth annual ethics conference on April 5– is it the fifth already? — marks the end of its formative years.

It is the last conference for me.

I am leaving UW-Madison. On July 1, I begin a new era for myself, as director of the Turnbull Center in Portland, part of the University of Oregon’s School of Journalism and Communication. My leaving marks the end of the CJE’s early years. It also signals the beginning of an exciting era under a new leader.

I have had the honor, and pleasure, to found the CJE and to develop the center in its crucial first years of existence, from 2008 onward. Despite the nation’s economic meltdown, we never lost faith that the center would survive the tough times.

It has done more than ‘survive.’ It is now a nationally known and respected center with substantial contributions to the development of journalism ethics.

At our conferences, we have had incredible conversations, from reporting elections and the impact of a partisan press to the future of journalism in a digital media world. The fifth conference is no different. We tackle the independence of journalists in new media environments.

A new center director will be selected soon. Whomever it is, he or she will take the center to a new level of achievement and national (and international) reknown. In the years ahead, I know I will look back at this legacy called the Center for Journalism Ethics. I will smile at how the center has continued to grow through the efforts of so many different people — journalists, scholars, foundations, corporations, alumni, students.

I owe so much to so many people that I won’t even try to name them here. I will thank them personally. They know who they are.

Change is a strange bittersweet affair. One feels energized as a new path opens up; yet, one is also regretful that some paths close behind you. I leave the center where I hoped it would be, back in 2008: economically secure, noted, and known for its excellence in staging seminal events. Now, it is time for fresh ideas and new growth.

The center must continue with its mission.

Our democracy needs the combined efforts of responsible journalists, concerned citizens, and creative media institutions in the maintainence of public journalism amid a media revolution.

Without such journalism, citizens only fool themselves when they claim they are informed and self-governing.